But it's only one in a sea other great accomplishments. If this game was his one defining moment as a game developer, it MIGHT be appropriate. Like Indrian said, the other articles don't have his picture, nor should they.If you had a photograph of a younger Miyamoto from the time of the release, then maybe, but I agree with the above, it's detracting. It's free use, yes, and so we can use it for decorative purposes, but I don't think the article needs it. I do not think that the Miyamoto image is of relevance to this article.Here, the photo just adds needless clutter. Furthermore, no other Miyamoto game has his image, and that includes two featured articles, Super Mario 64 and Ocarina of Time. I feel the photo is compeltely unnecessary because it does nothing to illuminate the subject at hand, which is the game itself and not Mr.In fact the only thing I could really say something about are the first two screenshots: it might work better if the first focused solely on the world map with a regular looking mario in the shot (possibly showing the quick item menu too) and the second discussing the addition of suits in general to the game.- Kung Fu Man ( talk) 17:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC) I have no problem with Miyamoto's photo on the page: the image is free-use, and thus doesn't contribute to the fair-use limitation.Some discussion about this would be useful. Yet I don't feel strongly one way or another. Now, what does everyone think about having the Miyamoto photo in this article? I don't see the need for it. No one seems to want to bring this to the talk page, but it's obviously a point of contention, so I'll do it. 17 Who keeps removing the "Virtual Console" re-release dates on Wikipedia Articles?.16 Proposed merge with Super Mario Advance 4: Super Mario Bros.
#OLD SUPER MARIO BROS. 3 MARIO SPRITES DEVIANTART PLUS#
14 4 million plus 7 million times $40 does not equal 500 million dollars.11 Also includes a remake of Mario Bros.